Date when discovered YYYY/MM/DD |
From version |
Product |
Description |
Fixed in version |
2020/11/19 |
NP2020 |
NP Road and Railway |
Use of Boundaries and Object Bridge or Tunnel when only one side of the road uses this type of Object can give wrong cut and fill solids. The model must have the same Object and chainage for the boundaries on both sides of the road. |
|
2020/10/23 |
NP2020 |
NP Road and Railway |
Detailed Quantity report gets wrong quantities if road/railway model has boundary on left side in centerline. Summary report and the X-sect based detailed report gives correct quantities. Workaround is to add Distance 0.01 from Centerline for boundary. |
NP2020.FP1a |
2020/10/13 |
Quadri2020 |
Quadri for Win |
When importing DWG, and in settings > Solid/Surface, the value of “Max face edge lenght” can not be 0 (zero), or the program will hang. Any other value is ok. |
NP2020.FP1a |
2020/10/12 |
NP2020 |
NP Road and Railway |
Road model/Railway model. Soft spot removal does not work in Simple mode. Advanced mode has to be used to get the removal of soft spot layer. |
|
2020/10/01 |
NP2020 |
NP WS |
Splitting a trench, where user defined attributes are added, may cause that the user defined attributes will be deleted during rebuild of the trench task. |
NP2020.FP1 |
2020/09/24 |
NP20/21/2020 |
Alignment Design |
Alignment Design in Road and Rail does not work on Windows 10 version 2004 and AutoCAD later than 2015. This is related to Windows version 2004 only. |
NP2020.FP1a |
2020/09/21 |
2020 |
NP Road |
Quantities can in some models be wrong if many soil layers have holes or cross eachother. |
|
2020/05/27 |
Quadri2020 |
Quadri for Win |
There are two sets of EPGS codes representing UTM Zone 32N,33N,35N. When importing norwegian SOSI file you will get the EPGS = 25832, 25833 or 25835. Temporary solution: If your model is defined with EPGS code 3044, 3045 or 3047 - that also represent 32N, 33N, 35N - look at the text behind the codes, and if that defines that same UTM zone, you should click “CRS is same as model”, as these are identical. |
|
2020/05/11 |
21? |
NP Road |
Sight analysis can fail for some road models. Related to the roadmodel building 1mm before the start chainage. Temporary solution: Build roadmodel, but start sightanalysis with start chainage a bit after the actual startchainage for the model. |
|
2020/03/01 |
21.FP4? |
NP Road |
Roadmodel results may look choppy. Happens when combining roadmodel boundary to centerline when cross-sections are overlapping (because of sharp turn on alignment) and the following cleanup that we do to the results. Temporary solution: Change the boundary to alignment to also have a distance of 1cm or similar. |
|
2020/01/17 |
21.FP4 |
NP Road |
Rock <1m not included in summary report. |
|
2019/12/19 |
21.FP4 |
NP Road |
Wrong area on pavement layers can occur in quantity report when using the rehab-pavement function. |
|
2019/11/20 |
21 |
NP Tunnel |
When using Novapoint Tunnel in AutoCAD for 3D-drawing e.g., you sometimes get a stopping error message telling you that the tunnel task is incompatible. You must then restart AutoCAD to be able to proceed with your tunnel task. |
|
2019/09/24 |
21 |
NP Tunnel |
Tunnel The Tunnel Design dialog: Scanner data is shown with an offset compared to the design profile. |
NP2020 |
2019/06/28 |
21 |
NP Road |
Vegetation and topsoil removal using vertical-vertical does not work. No material is removed and no fill is put back in. |
|
2019/06 |
21 |
NP Tunnel |
3D drawing functionality hangs for some models. |
NP2020 |
2019/05/28 |
21.FP4 |
NP Road |
Errors in 3D results when road model goes in circle and crosses itself. From FP4a: Solution is improved when the road is completely crossing itself, but still not when it has a minor overlap in the results. |
|
2019/01/19 |
21 |
NP Tunnel |
Showing triangulated pointcloud fail for some projects. |
NP2020 |
2018/08/15 |
21 |
NP Tunnel |
Content on LandXML export has issues in some situations. |
|
2018/05/09 |
21 |
NP Tunnel |
Opening geology and rock support registration is slower than in NP20. |
NP2020 |
2018/05/09 |
21 |
NP Road |
Deep blasting endsurface method 3 always goes to the last ditch surface. Temporary solution: Use endsurface method 2 instead. |
|
2018/05/09 |
21 |
NP Road |
Draw roadmodel missing possibility to draw contourlines. Temporary solution: Draw out through a planpresentation in Base to CAD. Select roadtask and set the global filter on objects to Medium=On Terrain. |
NP2020 |
2017/10/09 |
ALL |
NP Road |
Sight distance calculaton gives error about Cross-section calculation insufficient for roads build shorter than 100m. Temporary solution: Extend the road in start or end and use boundaries on left- and righthand side to the centerline. |
|
2017/01/05 |
ALL |
NP Road |
Error in deepblasting when it hits the rock surface in two or more places in the cross-section. Deepblasting surface is then create above the rock surface. Quantities for deepblasting is also wrong. |
|
2016/09/11 |
20 |
NP Road |
Error in sight analysis results. NOTE: Sight analysis report is correct, and we see sightlines in the model, but when a not-approved sightline is found, the sightline does not have the correct direction/length. |
|
— |
ALL |
NP Road |
Top soil or vegetation removal above soft soil removal can give varying results. Check the quantity calculations and mass hatches in cross-section drawings to indentify errors. |
|