james converting to phase center makes our QA processes way harder. i do not see why the software would act this way, or if you want to show phase center then do not remove the field measurements that we made and show both.
i know that it is possible for the software to keep the method because i can see it with survey pro. do you think your team could look at holding how we measure in the field? actually i see that the info is stored. so it seems like tbc could be back calculating to show what we measure in the field:


i guess the harder thing is when a second rover is hooked to that base, again i think survey pro has prompts for what you are measuring to at the base.
thomas
the 'from method' refers to the base station. so it depends on how you tape measured your base and what notes you have for that information. most people would use the lever extension and tape from lever to a control point on the ground. the software figures out the triangle solution.
i actually noticed that you have short tape measurements, that makes me think that you are setup on a concrete/steel pilar, in that case i usually do not use the lever because you can not actually tape to the center that is hidden under the tribrach and the shorter tape reading makes the difference larger than on longer tape readings. but this is another issue.
you can see in my image clips above that you should be able to see what you actually measured and put in your data collector in the line for your base setup.
the 'to method' refers to the rover. and your screen shot shows 'phase center' and a 2m pole. i would assume that most people would use 'bottom of quick release' on a standard 2m pole. but you should pull out a tape measure and double check. there are some poles that are setup differently.
it seems like you should resetup and take a couple check shots if you are in question with any of this, if possible.


------------------------------
ian bissonnette
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 05-14-2024 15:56
From: Thomas Sproule
Subject: R12i base station issue
Thank you for all the information and help everyone, That update has solved the issues, I was lead in the wrong direction with my boss. Who seems to think if we never change our TBC software, we never will need to update anything ha.
The last thing I just need to confirm (for my own sanity and My bosses ultimately)
The "From Method" column. If I am measuring to my R10/R12 Lever Extension. Does that column need to say R10/R12 lever extension. Or should it say Antenna Phase center.
again. Thank you all for the help.
Original Message:
Sent: 5/13/2024 7:41:00 PM
From: ian bissonnette
Subject: RE: R12i base station issue
i did what florentin said and updated the gps config, there is actually a 25 version now that made it so that i did not have to go in and change that date. (i tried at first and had a hard time because it would not let me store the change with notepad anyways). so this solved the invalid leap seconds that i have had for a bit now. but i still get the phase center when i would rather not have the phase center. i have a screen shot with the same base station and rover on two different days. first day is with survey pro on tsc3. second day is with tsc5 and access 2023 latest version. i think they have a 2024 coming out right about now. also of interest, when i import from survey pro i get a pop up with base information for the survey, including base height and measured to. but with access it just dumps all the data in, with no check in.

------------------------------
ian bissonnette
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 05-13-2024 07:35
From: Florentin Toplicianu
Subject: R12i base station issue
Based on the screenshot you have an invalid leap seconds error, and unknown antenna type.
Please follow below steps to correct this issue, in TBC/Support/ Check for updates / Download and install Trimble GPS Configuration Utility.
Invalid leap seconds in TBC | Trimble Business Center
The TBC team have just release an updated GPS Configuration Files Utility to address this issue.

Regards,
------------------------------
Florentin Toplicianu